On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 06:03:52PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote: > On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 05:34:36PM +0100, Åsmund Ødegård wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Anders Logg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 04:34:40PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 01:12:17PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > On Tue, February 19, 2008 Anders Logg wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 11:18:01AM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Ola Skavhaug wrote: > > > > > >> > Johannes Ring skrev den 19/02-2008 følgende: > > > > > >> >> On Mon, Feb 18, Anders Logg wrote: > > > > > >> >>> On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 02:33:40PM +0000, Garth N. Wells > > > wrote: > > > > > >> >>>> This is good juncture at which re-focus on important goals > > > for a > > > > > >> >>>> hopefully not too distant next release. Three priorities > > > that I see > > > > > >> are: > > > > > >> >>>> > > > > > >> >>>> - New build system. > > > > > >> >>> I think Johannes (http://simula.no/portal_memberdata/johannr) > > > has > > > > > >> >>> started looking at this. > > > > > >> >> Unfortunately, I haven't had very much time to look at this > > > lately. > > > > > >> >> Hopefully I will get some time later this week so I can start > > > working > > > > > >> on > > > > > >> >> this (if that is what Ola wants me to do). > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Sure, this is relatively high on the priority list. As a nice > > > side > > > > > >> effect, you > > > > > >> > will become an expert SCons user, useful in lots of other > > > projects :) > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Give that a release has just been made, this could be a good > > > moment to > > > > > >> bite the bullet and implement the new build system in dolfin-dev, > > > and > > > > > >> accept that things will be broken for a little while. It would be > > > good > > > > > >> to have the build system largely sorted out before getting stuck > > > into > > > > > >> parallelisation. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Garth > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, it's the only way to get it tested. As long as the scons-based > > > > > > DOLFIN is in a separate repository, it will be ignored by everyone. > > > > > > > > > > > > So let's break things as quickly as possible so we can fix them. > > > > > > > > > > > > Johannes, tell us as soon as you have something that "works" (for > > > > > > you). Then everyone can take a quick look and if there are no > > > > > > objections we push it to the main repository and work from there. > > > > > > > > > > The SCons build system for DOLFIN should be in a more or less > > > "working" > > > > > state right now. I have updated the instructions at > > > > > http://www.fenics.org/wiki/Compiling_DOLFIN_with_SCons > > > > > > > > > > Please, have a go! > > > > > > > > Very nice! (I haven't checked it yet but I assume it is...) > > > > > > > > I suggest we set a deadline for next Friday (March 14) for comments on > > > > the new build system. So let's everyone try it out and see if it > > > > works. If there are no major objections, we'll push this to dolfin-dev > > > > next Friday. > > > > > > I get the following error when running scons: > > > > > > scons: Reading SConscript files ... > > > AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'defaultPythonLib': > > > File "/scratch/src/dolfin/dolfin-scons/SConstruct", line 50: > > > scons.defaultPythonLib(prefix="$prefix")), > > > > Try hg pull/update and show me the output of 'scons' (there should be > > some debug-print towards the top). > > > > Åsmund > > scons: Reading SConscript files ... > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/simula_scons/__init__.pyc > AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'defaultPythonLib': > File "/scratch/src/dolfin/dolfin-scons/SConstruct", line 52: > scons.defaultPythonLib(prefix="$prefix")),
ok, I see now what the problem is. I do have an old version of simula_scons. -- Anders _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
