Anders Logg wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 06:03:52PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 05:34:36PM +0100, Åsmund Ødegård wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Anders Logg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 04:34:40PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote:
>>>>  > On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 01:12:17PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>>  > > On Tue, February 19, 2008 Anders Logg wrote:
>>>>  > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 11:18:01AM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>>>>  > > >>
>>>>  > > >>
>>>>  > > >> Ola Skavhaug wrote:
>>>>  > > >> > Johannes Ring skrev den 19/02-2008 følgende:
>>>>  > > >> >> On Mon, Feb 18, Anders Logg wrote:
>>>>  > > >> >>> On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 02:33:40PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>>>>  > > >> >>>> This is good juncture at which re-focus on important goals 
>>>> for a
>>>>  > > >> >>>> hopefully not too distant next release. Three priorities that 
>>>> I see
>>>>  > > >> are:
>>>>  > > >> >>>>
>>>>  > > >> >>>> - New build system.
>>>>  > > >> >>> I think Johannes (http://simula.no/portal_memberdata/johannr) 
>>>> has
>>>>  > > >> >>> started looking at this.
>>>>  > > >> >> Unfortunately, I haven't had very much time to look at this 
>>>> lately.
>>>>  > > >> >> Hopefully I will get some time later this week so I can start 
>>>> working
>>>>  > > >> on
>>>>  > > >> >> this (if that is what Ola wants me to do).
>>>>  > > >> >
>>>>  > > >> > Sure, this is relatively high on the priority list. As a nice 
>>>> side
>>>>  > > >> effect, you
>>>>  > > >> > will become an expert SCons user, useful in lots of other 
>>>> projects :)
>>>>  > > >> >
>>>>  > > >>
>>>>  > > >> Give that a release has just been made, this could be a good 
>>>> moment to
>>>>  > > >> bite the bullet and implement the new build system in dolfin-dev, 
>>>> and
>>>>  > > >> accept that things will be broken for a little while. It would be 
>>>> good
>>>>  > > >> to have the build system largely sorted out before getting stuck 
>>>> into
>>>>  > > >> parallelisation.
>>>>  > > >>
>>>>  > > >> Garth
>>>>  > > >
>>>>  > > > Yes, it's the only way to get it tested. As long as the scons-based
>>>>  > > > DOLFIN is in a separate repository, it will be ignored by everyone.
>>>>  > > >
>>>>  > > > So let's break things as quickly as possible so we can fix them.
>>>>  > > >
>>>>  > > > Johannes, tell us as soon as you have something that "works" (for
>>>>  > > > you). Then everyone can take a quick look and if there are no
>>>>  > > > objections we push it to the main repository and work from there.
>>>>  > >
>>>>  > > The SCons build system for DOLFIN should be in a more or less 
>>>> "working"
>>>>  > > state right now. I have updated the instructions at
>>>>  > > http://www.fenics.org/wiki/Compiling_DOLFIN_with_SCons
>>>>  > >
>>>>  > > Please, have a go!
>>>>  >
>>>>  > Very nice! (I haven't checked it yet but I assume it is...)
>>>>  >
>>>>  > I suggest we set a deadline for next Friday (March 14) for comments on
>>>>  > the new build system. So let's everyone try it out and see if it
>>>>  > works. If there are no major objections, we'll push this to dolfin-dev
>>>>  > next Friday.
>>>>
>>>>  I get the following error when running scons:
>>>>
>>>>  scons: Reading SConscript files ...
>>>>  AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'defaultPythonLib':
>>>>   File "/scratch/src/dolfin/dolfin-scons/SConstruct", line 50:
>>>>     scons.defaultPythonLib(prefix="$prefix")),
>>> Try hg pull/update and show me the output of 'scons' (there should be
>>> some debug-print towards the top).
>>>
>>> Åsmund
>> scons: Reading SConscript files ...
>> /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/simula_scons/__init__.pyc
>> AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'defaultPythonLib':
>>   File "/scratch/src/dolfin/dolfin-scons/SConstruct", line 52:
>>     scons.defaultPythonLib(prefix="$prefix")),
> 
> ok, I see now what the problem is. I do have an old version of
> simula_scons.
> 

Where was the old version installed? I have the same error but I can't 
find the old files.

Garth
_______________________________________________
DOLFIN-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev

Reply via email to