Anders Logg wrote: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 05:00:22PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 Anders Logg wrote: >>>> It looks like the SCOTCH test was modified to not include common.h >>>> (as I suggested). But as pointed out by Johannes, common.h is needed >>>> to compile the test program. >>>> >>>> Could we add common.h back? >>> Sorry about that. Should be fixed now! >>> >> I'm having trouble with SCOTCH. I get >> >> Checking for scotch... no (pkg-config file not found) >> Trying to generate pkg-config file for scotch... failed >> *** Unable to generate a suitable pkg-config file for scotch. >> *** If scotch is present on your system, try setting the SCOTCH_DIR >> *** environment variable to the directory where scotch is installed. >> *** SCOTCH_DIR is currently set to /usr/local >> >> both before and after setting SCOCTH_DIR. > > I guess you did it without the typo? >
Yes, even without the typo it doesn't work. Where can I find a log with the tests that scons has performed so I can have a go at debugging this? Garth > Anyway, it works for me now. > > Another suggestion for the build system is to collect things that work > and things that didn't work so instead of > > Found optional package: petsc > Unable to find optional package: slepc > Found optional package: scotch > Found optional package: umfpack > Found optional package: gts > > one gets > > Found optional package: petsc > Found optional package: scotch > Found optional package: umfpack > Found optional package: gts > Unable to find optional package: slepc > > Don't know how hard this is to fix. It's not very important but pretty > printing is worth quite a bit. > _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
