Anders Logg wrote: > I have made some further adjustments to the assembly benchmark in > > bench/fem/assembly/cpp > > The results are here: > > > http://www.fenics.org/hg/dolfin?f=82bebeaa545c;file=bench/fem/assembly/cpp/bench.log > > Before trying to conclude anything from the results, please run the > benchmark and report your results. There may still be bugs. Please take > a look at the benchmark code as well, it's fairly short. It would be > good if we could settle on a fixed benchmark that we all trust and > then continue to discuss what to do about improving the numbers. >
My results are quite different, so perhaps we could post results with machine details, compiler options, etc, to the wiki? Garth > The benchmark code is here: > > > http://www.fenics.org/hg/dolfin?f=1378b25bf84b;file=bench/fem/assembly/cpp/main.cpp > > Just to trigger some discussion, Epetra seems to be the worst backend > in the assembly event, but the clear winner in the reassembly event. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > DOLFIN-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
