Anders Logg wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 10:44:25PM +0200, Anders Logg wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 09:05:22PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>>>
>>> Anders Logg wrote:
>>>> I have made some further adjustments to the assembly benchmark in
>>>>
>>>>   bench/fem/assembly/cpp
>>>>
>>>> The results are here:
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>> http://www.fenics.org/hg/dolfin?f=82bebeaa545c;file=bench/fem/assembly/cpp/bench.log
>>>>
>>>> Before trying to conclude anything from the results, please run the
>>>> benchmark and report your results. There may still be bugs. Please take
>>>> a look at the benchmark code as well, it's fairly short. It would be
>>>> good if we could settle on a fixed benchmark that we all trust and
>>>> then continue to discuss what to do about improving the numbers.
>>>>
>>> My results are quite different, so perhaps we could post results with 
>>> machine details, compiler options, etc, to the wiki?
>>>
>>> Garth
>> Sounds like a good idea.
> 
> ok, here's the page, let's see some numbers:
> 
>   http://www.fenics.org/wiki/Benchmark
>

I just added my results.

The most obvious difference in our systems is 32/64 bit which could 
likely account for the differences. MTL4 seems considerably faster on 
the 32 bit system.

Garth

> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DOLFIN-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
_______________________________________________
DOLFIN-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev

Reply via email to