On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 03:03:06PM -0400, Shawn Walker wrote: > I see that you want to keep the mesh topology separated from the > geometry, right? But, even now, this is slightly violated in the current > .xml format, because with each vertex index, you give the coordinates. > If all you wanted was the topology, then the coordinates would not be > necessary. The coordinates are only need to make sense of the geometry of > the mesh (i.e. whether there is overlap of triangles or inverted > triangles, etc). So, technically, there should be a list of topological > vertices and a separate list of geometric vertices. > > Is this what you mean? > > - Shawn
Yes. We might need to break the XML format by having a <topology> tag and a <geometry> tag which are separate. -- Anders
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
