On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 03:26:14PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote: > ok, then this higher order mesh data should definitely have it's own > function space. Is it possible to have a FunctionSpace variable (for the > mesh) within the usual FunctionSpace variable for the variational > problem? It's either that or have two separate FunctionSpace variables > floating around and pass them to the bilinear form everytime. > > - Shawn
I imagine something like this: A FunctionSpace V has a variable coordinates (a Function). That Function in turn has a FunctionSpace W (as all other Functions). V does not have to be the same as V, but it can (for isoparametric elements). -- Anders
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
