Johan Hake wrote: > On Friday 13 February 2009 12:27:57 Garth N. Wells wrote: >> It would be nice to make a new DOLFIN release in the next few days. Are >> there any pressing issues that need to be addressed before releasing 0.9.1? >> >> Also, are new releases of other packages (FFC/Instant/Viper) required >> for compatibility? > > For PyDOLFIN, yes. > > Then we need new releases of at least Instant, FFC and UFC. >
OK. > Not sure what to do with UFC, though, as the versions of UFC, for now has > been > correlated with the state of the ufc.h file. This has (has it?) not been > changed since 1.1. However UFC now comes with a python extension module, > ufc.py which both FFC and PyDOLFIN needs. > Perhaps we need a distinction between the file ufc.h and the the package UFC. What if version numbers 1.x.y are used, where x indicates the ufc.h version and changes in y are then related to the UFC 'package' (supporting tools). Garth > Johan _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
