On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 12:46:53PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote: > > > Anders Logg wrote: > > Shouldn't this be templated? This could be used also for passing uint > > arrays to and from Python. > > > > It probably should be, but it may make things more complicated on the > SWIG side. Perhaps Johan H. could comment - not on whether it's possible > (I'm sure for Johan that it is), but on whether or not it's easy. > > Templating it would be better on the C++ side, not just for double, int, > etc, but to handle const pointers correctly.
ok. > > I imagine we can typedef > > > > DoubleArray > > UintArray > > > > This is a bit ugly. Might as well just use Array<double>, Array<uint>, etc. I agree it's ugly. I didn't suggest it for use in C++ but that it might simplify for the wrapper generators but when I think of it again, it probably makes no difference for SWIG. -- Anders
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
