Anders Logg wrote: > On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 12:46:53PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote: >> >> Anders Logg wrote: >>> Shouldn't this be templated? This could be used also for passing uint >>> arrays to and from Python. >>> >> It probably should be, but it may make things more complicated on the >> SWIG side. Perhaps Johan H. could comment - not on whether it's possible >> (I'm sure for Johan that it is), but on whether or not it's easy. >> >> Templating it would be better on the C++ side, not just for double, int, >> etc, but to handle const pointers correctly. > > ok. > >>> I imagine we can typedef >>> >>> DoubleArray >>> UintArray >>> >> This is a bit ugly. Might as well just use Array<double>, Array<uint>, etc. > > I agree it's ugly. I didn't suggest it for use in C++ but that it > might simplify for the wrapper generators but when I think of it > again, it probably makes no difference for SWIG. >
As a start, we can declare the templates with these names in SWIG, and SWIG will wrap the member functions and it should work out of the box (with a few tweaks for [] and =). Later, we can provide typemaps for cases where we want to map an Array to a NumPy array. Garth > -- > Anders _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
