On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:36:06AM +0100, Johannes Ring wrote: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Anders Logg <l...@simula.no> wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 10:45:09PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote: > >> > >> > >> Anders Logg wrote: > >> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:27:07AM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Anders Logg wrote: > >> >>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:18:19AM +0100, Anders Logg wrote: > >> >>>> Here's an update on the status for getting packages ready for > >> >>>> inclusion in the next Ubuntu LTS release. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> 1. Johannes needs all releases to be ready by Monday. That will give > >> >>>> him a couple of days to prepare the packages. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Which releases do we want to make? There have been JIT compiler fixes > >> >>>> in FFC and UFL that would be good to get in, and also updates in > >> >>>> DOLFIN. > >> >>> As far as I can see, we are ready to make the following releases: > >> >>> > >> >>> UFL 0.5.2 > >> >>> FErari 0.2.0 > >> >>> FFC 0.9.1 > >> >>> > >> >>> I can just push the button on these if no one has anything to add. > >> >>> > >> >>> The following remains: > >> >>> > >> >>> Instant 0.9.8: Why is the buildbot failing? > >> >>> DOLFIN 0.9.7: SCOTCH problems > >> >>> > >> >> DOLFIN should be straightened out today. There are no problems per se, > >> >> just the efficiency needs to be improved. I've done this for one > >> >> function, and just now need to do it for another. > >> > > >> > Everything except DOLFIN should be ready for release now. It's > >> > currently failing on the buildbot with > >> > > >> > In file included from dolfin/fem/DofMap.cpp:24: > >> > dolfin/fem/DofMapBuilder.h:13:35: error: boost/unordered_set.hpp: No > >> > such file or directory > >> > In file included from dolfin/fem/DofMap.cpp:24: > >> > > >> > >> Where is Boost installed on the buildbot? > > > > Don't know but I assume it's the regular Debian/Ubuntu packages. > > > > Johannes knows. > > Yes, it's the Ubuntu packages, however, the file > boost/unordered_set.hpp is not in the Boost packages on Hardy > (linux64-exp is also currently Hardy). If a newer version of Boost is > required I guess we should drop support for Hardy and upgrade the > buildbots.
Yes, let's drop support for Hardy. It's close to two years old now and I think there's a very limited number of people still using Hardy. (Actually, I know of someone (@KVS), but his upgrade is long overdue...) -- Anders
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
