On 2/16/10 10:27 AM, Johannes Ring wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Harish Narayanan > <harish.mli...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 2/16/10 9:06 AM, Garth N. Wells wrote: >>> >>> >>> Anders Logg wrote: >>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 08:42:55AM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Anders Logg wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:09:31AM +0100, Johannes Ring wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Anders Logg <l...@simula.no> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 03:49:05PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UFL 0.5.2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FErari 0.2.0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FFC 0.9.1 >>>>>>>> Now released. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Instant 0.9.8: Why is the buildbot failing? >>>>>>>> Now released. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DOLFIN 0.9.7: SCOTCH problems >>>>>>>> Remains to fix: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Drop Hardy support (upgrade buildbots) >>>>>>> This might take some time, at least for linux64-exp since I have no >>>>>>> control over this. I guess it will be upgraded when Lucid is out. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What should we install on hardy-i386? Karmic or perhaps Lucid? >>>>>> I think we should choose the simplest option. I don't know what is >>>>>> easiest and fastest, either dropping Hardy support (which requires >>>>>> upgrades of buildbots and some extra administration) or adding the >>>>>> required #ifdefs for unordered_set/set. Garth? >>>>>> >>>>> I don't want to add ifdefs (it actually involves more than just that). >>>>> Harish told me yesterday that he wasn't using the standard OSX gcc (his >>>>> old version didn't support tr1 well), which means we could probably >>>>> switch back to using the tr1 unordered containers and not break Hardy or >>>>> standard standard OSX installations. >>>>> >>>>> I would still suggest that we drop Hardy in the near future, perhaps >>>>> once Lucid is out. >>>> >>>> That seems like a good plan since Lucid is the next LTS release. >>>> >>>> Do you know which #ifdefs to add so we can get the buildbot green? >>>> >>> >>> No ifdefs. Just change >>> >>> boost::unordered_set -> std::tr1::unordered_set >>> boost::unordered_map -> std::tr1::unordered_map >>> >>> and the relevant includes. >> >> This should work, except it might break the mac buildbot. While I wasn't >> using the most recent OS X or gcc, I think I was in line with the mac >> buildbot. >> >> Johannes, what does the buildbot run? Leopard or Snow Leopard, and what >> gcc does it use? > > I think it was Leopard and gcc 4.3 from fink. However, the mac > buildbot has been offline for some weeks now. We have bought a new > imac to be used as a dedicated mac buildbot but I haven't started to > install anything on it yet. I'm not sure if we should go for fink or > macports. Any recommendations?
I suggest MacPorts. It is a bit more unstable than fink, but it allows for greater control and has a very recent collection of packages. Harish _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
