Johannes Ring wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Garth N. Wells <gn...@cam.ac.uk> wrote: >> >> Johannes Ring wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Garth N. Wells <gn...@cam.ac.uk> wrote: >>>> Anders Logg wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 03:38:18PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote: >>>>>> Anders Logg wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 04:29:24PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 01:23:33PM +0100, Johannes Ring wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Harish Narayanan >>>>>>>>> <harish.mli...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2/16/10 10:27 AM, Johannes Ring wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Harish Narayanan >>>>>>>>>>> <harish.mli...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/16/10 9:06 AM, Garth N. Wells wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Anders Logg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 08:42:55AM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anders Logg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:09:31AM +0100, Johannes Ring wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Anders Logg <l...@simula.no> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 03:49:05PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UFL 0.5.2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FErari 0.2.0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FFC 0.9.1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now released. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Instant 0.9.8: Why is the buildbot failing? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now released. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DOLFIN 0.9.7: SCOTCH problems >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Remains to fix: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Drop Hardy support (upgrade buildbots) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This might take some time, at least for linux64-exp since I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> control over this. I guess it will be upgraded when Lucid is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What should we install on hardy-i386? Karmic or perhaps Lucid? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should choose the simplest option. I don't know >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> easiest and fastest, either dropping Hardy support (which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> requires >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> upgrades of buildbots and some extra administration) or adding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> required #ifdefs for unordered_set/set. Garth? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't want to add ifdefs (it actually involves more than just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harish told me yesterday that he wasn't using the standard OSX >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gcc (his >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> old version didn't support tr1 well), which means we could >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch back to using the tr1 unordered containers and not break >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hardy or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> standard standard OSX installations. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would still suggest that we drop Hardy in the near future, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perhaps >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once Lucid is out. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That seems like a good plan since Lucid is the next LTS release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you know which #ifdefs to add so we can get the buildbot >>>>>>>>>>>>>> green? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No ifdefs. Just change >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> boost::unordered_set -> std::tr1::unordered_set >>>>>>>>>>>>> boost::unordered_map -> std::tr1::unordered_map >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and the relevant includes. >>>>>>>>>>>> This should work, except it might break the mac buildbot. While I >>>>>>>>>>>> wasn't >>>>>>>>>>>> using the most recent OS X or gcc, I think I was in line with the >>>>>>>>>>>> mac >>>>>>>>>>>> buildbot. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Johannes, what does the buildbot run? Leopard or Snow Leopard, and >>>>>>>>>>>> what >>>>>>>>>>>> gcc does it use? >>>>>>>>>>> I think it was Leopard and gcc 4.3 from fink. However, the mac >>>>>>>>>>> buildbot has been offline for some weeks now. We have bought a new >>>>>>>>>>> imac to be used as a dedicated mac buildbot but I haven't started to >>>>>>>>>>> install anything on it yet. I'm not sure if we should go for fink or >>>>>>>>>>> macports. Any recommendations? >>>>>>>>>> I suggest MacPorts. It is a bit more unstable than fink, but it >>>>>>>>>> allows >>>>>>>>>> for greater control and has a very recent collection of packages. >>>>>>>>> Thanks, I will look at MacPorts when I setup the new buildbot. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Johannes >>>>>>>> So is the conclusion that std::tr1::unordered_set will work with >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1. Modern operating systems >>>>>>>> 2. Ubuntu Hardy >>>>>>>> 3. New Mac versions (which is what we will run on the buildbot) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If so I (or someone else) can switch to std::tr1::unordered_set. >>>>>>> And the scotch/parmetis include thing needs to be fixed. Garth? >>>>>>> >>>>>> I can take a look tonight, although I haven't followed closely what the >>>>>> problem is. >>>>> Great. There seems to be a conflict between two versions of >>>>> parmetis.h, the ParMETIS one and another installed by SCOTCH. >>>>> >>>>> I think the solution is to add a scotch/ prefix in the #include >>>>> and modify the include path accordingly so it doesn't pick up >>>>> parmetis.h from SCOTCH when the real one is needed. >>>>> >>>> How can I reproduce the problem? I don't see it on my machine. Sounds >>>> strange that SCOTCH includes parmetis.h. Is it the compatibility >>>> functions that SCOTCH provides that cause the problem? >>> This is how I build SCOTCH and PT-SCOTCH on the buildbot: >>> >>> wget http://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/23390/scotch_5.1.7.tar.gz >>> tar zxf scotch_5.1.7.tar.gz >>> cd scotch_5.1/src >>> ln -s Make.inc/Makefile.inc.i686_pc_linux2 Makefile.inc >>> sed -i "/^CCD/s/gcc/mpicc/g" Makefile.in >>> sed -i "/^CFLAGS/s/= /= -fPIC /g" Makefile.inc >>> make >>> make ptscotch >>> cd .. >>> export SCOTCH_DIR=$PWD >>> >>> Then I have >>> >>> ls $SCOTCH_DIR/include >>> metis.h parmetis.h ptscotchf.h ptscotch.h scotchf.h scotch.h >>> >>> But it seems that if I do "make install" it won't copy metis.h and >>> parmetis.h to $prefix/include so I guess that is the solution. >>> >> That's right. Hopefully this fixes the problem. > > Yes, let's hope so. I have forced a rebuild on the buildbot. >
I've just pushed a change for the unordered sets and forced a build. Garth > Johannes _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
