On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Marie E. Rognes <[email protected]> wrote: > On 02/03/2011 11:08 AM, Johannes Ring wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Joachim Berdal Haga <[email protected]> wrote: > > Could be an idea to use ccache on the buildbots, that really helps with > > The buildbots has always used ccache. > > Good! I thought they didn't because the build takes so long... an hour. Does > the cache get hits (ccache -s)? > > Yes, ccache works. The reason it takes so long is because it builds > DOLFIN in several different configurations. I think it should be > enough to do one minimal and one full build. Other opinions? > > I think it is good to test all these different configurations. But it would > be good to have a quickbot, reporting for instance after one minimal build + > tests
OK, but maybe we should discuss these configurations since they were chosen somewhat randomly I think. Currently we have four different build stages: 1. all optional packages disabled 2. UFMPACK, CHOLMOD, MTL4, CGAL, Python, and ZLIB enabled 3. MPI, SCOTCH, ParMETIS, and Trilinos enabled 4. PETSc, SLEPc, and GMP enabled The C++ demo programs are built between each stage. Can we reduce the number of stages? Johannes _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
