On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 08:44:52AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > On Wednesday February 9 2011 04:56:09 Marie E. Rognes wrote: > > On 02/09/2011 01:55 PM, Garth N. Wells wrote: > > > I think that this is overkill. I don't mind the buildbot breaking (by > > > accident) as long as it's fixed quickly. What causes problems are major > > > changes that result in extended red periods, and during which other > > > breakages are unknowingly introduced. This type of development should > > > take place in a personal branch. > > > > > > I'm happy with minor changes, incremental development, bug fixes, etc, > > > to be added by developers directly to main (with the expectation that > > > tests have been run locally). The less merging the better. > > > > Agree! > > + > > If the real reason for the more complicated push policy was that you do not > like what other developer introduce ;), we could try to use the Blueprint > and/or email list more!
I like the new "complicated" push policy (which is not so complicated, really) since it allows me to push the stuff I do quickly (often without testing) and not worrying about breaking anything. -- Anders _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
