On 09/02/11 17:18, Anders Logg wrote: > On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 08:44:52AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: >> On Wednesday February 9 2011 04:56:09 Marie E. Rognes wrote: >>> On 02/09/2011 01:55 PM, Garth N. Wells wrote: >>>> I think that this is overkill. I don't mind the buildbot breaking (by >>>> accident) as long as it's fixed quickly. What causes problems are major >>>> changes that result in extended red periods, and during which other >>>> breakages are unknowingly introduced. This type of development should >>>> take place in a personal branch. >>>> >>>> I'm happy with minor changes, incremental development, bug fixes, etc, >>>> to be added by developers directly to main (with the expectation that >>>> tests have been run locally). The less merging the better. >>> >>> Agree! >> >> + >> >> If the real reason for the more complicated push policy was that you do not >> like what other developer introduce ;), we could try to use the Blueprint >> and/or email list more! > > I like the new "complicated" push policy (which is not so complicated, > really) since it allows me to push the stuff I do quickly (often > without testing) and not worrying about breaking anything. >
I don't see how the simple or complicated approaches affect this - we're all free to break personal branches. Garth > -- > Anders > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin > Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
