On Monday March 14 2011 07:37:38 Anders Logg wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 07:23:10AM -0700, Johan Hake wrote: > > On Monday March 14 2011 06:48:10 Johannes Ring wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Johan Hake <johan.h...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Monday March 14 2011 05:38:25 Anders Logg wrote: > > > >> B1;2600;0cOn Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 01:34:19PM +0100, Johannes Ring wrote: > > > >> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Johannes Ring > > > >> > <joha...@simula.no> > > > > wrote: > > > >> > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Garth N. Wells > > > >> > > <gn...@cam.ac.uk> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > >> > >> On 14/03/11 09:32, Johannes Ring wrote: > > > >> > >>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 5:00 AM, Johan Hake > > > >> > >>> <johan.h...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > >> > >>>> Hello! > > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >>>> I have now removed all traces of SWIG code for version < 2.0. > > > >> > >>>> Unfortunately I have not been able to test it at my buildbot, > > > >> > >>>> as the versions has diverged, due to a previous merge gone > > > >> > >>>> wrong. > > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >>>> Johannes could you make a new branch of dolfin at my buildbot > > > >> > >>>> from > > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >>>> lp:~dolfin-core/dolfin/hake > > > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >>>> and maybe push force build after that? > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> Done. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> Have all the buildbots been updated to SWIG 2.0? > > > >> > > > > > >> > > No, I'm working on it. Only mac-osx and linux64-exp have SWIG > > > >> > > 2.0 at the moment. > > > >> > > > > >> > I have now upgraded SWIG to version 2.0 on the buildbots. The > > > >> > lucid-amd64 and maverick-i386 slaves, building dolfin-main, are > > > >> > using /usr/bin/swig2.0 from the Ubuntu package (backported from > > > >> > Natty), while the personal buildbots are using some locally > > > >> > installed SWIG. > > > >> > > > > >> > This results in errors like this on dolfin-main: > > > >> > OSError: PyDOLFIN was not compiled with the present version of > > > >> > swig. Install swig version 2.0.01 or recompiled PyDOLFIN with > > > >> > present swig > > > >> > > > > >> ~~~ > > > >> > > > >> Don't know how to fix but there's a typo in there. > > > > > > > > He, he, do not think this is the cause of the problem. > > No, but I wanted to point it out so someone can fix the typo (I don't > know where that string is located).
Sure! Should be fixed now. Johan > -- > Anders > > > > No, but where does that extra zero come from? > > > > That is what: > > swig -version > > > > gives you. > > > > > > This is done by setting: > > > > parameters["swig_binary"] = "swig2.0" > > > > > > > > I addressed this problem a while ago. Not sure how to "fix" this. > > > > Either by setting a global parameters.xml file, if this is possible, > > > > or patch globalparameters.py where the parameter is added. > > > > > > Yes, I remember that and I was looking at that post. We could rename > > > globalparameters.py to globalparameters.py.in and have CMake's > > > configure_file command generate globalparameters.py using the > > > SWIG_EXECUTABLE variable. I can do that if it sounds okay. > > > > Yes this is probably what we want. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
