On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Johan Hake <johan.h...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tuesday March 15 2011 01:44:33 Johannes Ring wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Johan Hake <johan.h...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Monday March 14 2011 08:10:32 Johannes Ring wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Johan Hake <johan.h...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > On Monday March 14 2011 06:48:10 Johannes Ring wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Johan Hake <johan.h...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> >> > On Monday March 14 2011 05:38:25 Anders Logg wrote: >> >> >> >> B1;2600;0cOn Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 01:34:19PM +0100, Johannes Ring >> > >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Johannes Ring >> >> >> >> > <joha...@simula.no> >> >> > >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Garth N. Wells >> >> >> >> > > <gn...@cam.ac.uk> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> > >> On 14/03/11 09:32, Johannes Ring wrote: >> >> >> >> > >>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 5:00 AM, Johan Hake >> >> >> >> > >>> <johan.h...@gmail.com> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> > >>>> Hello! >> >> >> >> > >>>> >> >> >> >> > >>>> I have now removed all traces of SWIG code for version < >> >> >> >> > >>>> 2.0. Unfortunately I have not been able to test it at my >> >> >> >> > >>>> buildbot, as the versions has diverged, due to a previous >> >> >> >> > >>>> merge gone wrong. >> >> >> >> > >>>> >> >> >> >> > >>>> Johannes could you make a new branch of dolfin at my >> >> >> >> > >>>> buildbot from >> >> >> >> > >>>> >> >> >> >> > >>>> lp:~dolfin-core/dolfin/hake >> >> >> >> > >>>> >> >> >> >> > >>>> and maybe push force build after that? >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> > >>> Done. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> Have all the buildbots been updated to SWIG 2.0? >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > No, I'm working on it. Only mac-osx and linux64-exp have SWIG >> >> >> >> > > 2.0 at the moment. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > I have now upgraded SWIG to version 2.0 on the buildbots. The >> >> >> >> > lucid-amd64 and maverick-i386 slaves, building dolfin-main, are >> >> >> >> > using /usr/bin/swig2.0 from the Ubuntu package (backported from >> >> >> >> > Natty), while the personal buildbots are using some locally >> >> >> >> > installed SWIG. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > This results in errors like this on dolfin-main: >> >> >> >> > OSError: PyDOLFIN was not compiled with the present version of >> >> >> >> > swig. Install swig version 2.0.01 or recompiled PyDOLFIN with >> >> >> >> > present swig >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ~~~ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Don't know how to fix but there's a typo in there. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > He, he, do not think this is the cause of the problem. >> >> >> >> >> >> No, but where does that extra zero come from? >> >> > >> >> > That is what: >> >> > >> >> > swig -version >> >> > >> >> > gives you. >> >> >> >> No, "/usr/bin/swig2.0 -version" gives me: >> >> >> >> $ /usr/bin/swig2.0 -version >> >> >> >> SWIG Version 2.0.1 >> >> >> >> Compiled with g++ [i686-pc-linux-gnu] >> >> >> >> Configured options: +pcre >> >> >> >> Please see http://www.swig.org for reporting bugs and further >> >> information >> > >> > Ok, fix on its way. It had to do with how we extract the SWIG version >> > while we generate the SWIG wrapper code. It is based on a >> > hexrepresentation of each digit. >> >> This works fine now. >> >> > Johan >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> Anders >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > How are we supposed to deal with this? I have used >> >> >> >> > -DSWIG_EXECUTABLE:FILEPATH=/usr/bin/swig2.0 when building UFC >> >> >> >> > and DOLFIN but how can this executable be specified when >> >> >> >> > running the tests? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > This is done by setting: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > parameters["swig_binary"] = "swig2.0" >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I addressed this problem a while ago. Not sure how to "fix" this. >> >> >> > Either by setting a global parameters.xml file, if this is >> >> >> > possible, or patch globalparameters.py where the parameter is >> >> >> > added. >> >> >> >> >> >> Yes, I remember that and I was looking at that post. We could rename >> >> >> globalparameters.py to globalparameters.py.in and have CMake's >> >> >> configure_file command generate globalparameters.py using the >> >> >> SWIG_EXECUTABLE variable. I can do that if it sounds okay. >> >> > >> >> > Yes this is probably what we want. >> >> >> >> Yes, I think so too. I tried it but when I run demo_poisson.py I still >> >> get this error: >> >> >> >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> >> File "demo_poisson.py", line 26, in <module> >> >> V = FunctionSpace(mesh, "Lagrange", 1) >> >> File >> >> "/tmp/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dolfin/function/functionspace.py >> >> ", line 237, in __init__ >> >> FunctionSpaceBase.__init__(self, mesh, element) >> >> File >> >> "/tmp/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dolfin/function/functionspace.py >> >> ", line 44, in __init__ >> >> ufc_element, ufc_dofmap = jit(self._ufl_element) >> >> File >> >> "/tmp/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dolfin/compilemodules/jit.py", >> >> line 47, in mpi_jit >> >> return local_jit(*args, **kwargs) >> >> File >> >> "/tmp/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dolfin/compilemodules/jit.py", >> >> line 84, in jit >> >> """%cpp.__swigversion__ >> >> OSError: PyDOLFIN was not compiled with the present version of swig. >> >> Install swig version 2.0.01 or recompiled PyDOLFIN with present swig >> >> >> >> It seems that "check_and_set_swig_binary" in instant/config.py never >> >> gets called. >> >> This is still a problem though. I think the problem is that >> configure_instant in compilemodules.py is called to late. If I add >> >> from compilemodules import configure_instant >> configure_instant() >> >> at the top in the jit function in jit.py, then it works fine. However, >> I'm not sure if it's the correct solution. > > Yes, this is definately the problem. I thought this would be taken care of > within ufc.build. But the check_swig version method is called before that > time... > > configure_instant does a lot more than just setting the swig_binary. I just > used the instant method check_and_set_swig_binary
Good. The buildbot seems to like this. Johannes _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
