On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 11:13:58AM -0700, Johan Hake wrote: > Hello! > > Recently we have had a couple of requests to add dolfin::Cell versions of > ufc::cell versions of methods in dolfin::FiniteElement. There are quite many > of the methods, and I think it looks ugly to have duplicates of all of these. > > Would it be OK to remove all dolfin::Cell versions and require C++ users to > generate a UFCCell, if they only have a dolfin::Cell, before they call the > corresponding method? We could then just add a typemap on the Pythonside > making it possible to call these methods using a dolfin::Cell. > > What you say?
Wouldn't it be possible (by some C++ constructor/cast magic) to make it work automatically with a DOLFIN Cell argument in place of a UFCCell? -- Anders _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
