Hi Kristian, On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Kristian Ølgaard <k.b.oelga...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 5 May 2011 20:13, Johan Hake <johan.h...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello! >> >> Recently we have had a couple of requests to add dolfin::Cell versions of >> ufc::cell versions of methods in dolfin::FiniteElement. There are quite many >> of the methods, and I think it looks ugly to have duplicates of all of these. >> >> Would it be OK to remove all dolfin::Cell versions and require C++ users to >> generate a UFCCell, if they only have a dolfin::Cell, before they call the >> corresponding method? We could then just add a typemap on the Pythonside >> making it possible to call these methods using a dolfin::Cell. > > So you want to remove the ability of using dolfin::Cell in C++ so you > can add it in Python? > I vote for making both available in C++ and Python, if that is not > possible, let's keep things the way they are.
While I am one of the instigators asking for the Python versions, I agree with you though :). It seems to me as if the Python and C++ interfaces should work the same as far as possible. This is particularly important given that a lot of the documentation only covers the C++ versions, so that should lead to the least surprise for Python users. Regards Neilen > > Kristian > >> What you say? >> >> Johan >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin >> Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin > Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
