On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Anders Logg <l...@simula.no> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 02:31:51PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote: >> On 17 November 2011 13:49, Andre Massing <mass...@simula.no> wrote: >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> > Hash: SHA1 >> > >> > On 11/17/2011 02:17 PM, Anders Logg wrote: >> >> Looks like someone forgot to run the tests before pushing to >> >> 1.0.x. >> >> >> >> Test were run. >> >> >> I just wanted to point this out since it wasn't me this time. :-P >> > >> > Actually, the change in the GlobalAssemble call in EpetraMatrix is the >> > culprit, it says: >> > >> > [ 61%] Building CXX object >> > dolfin/CMakeFiles/dolfin.dir/la/EpetraFactory.cpp.o >> > /home/buildbot/buildbots/main/fenics-src/dolfin/dolfin/la/EpetraMatrix.cpp: >> > In member function 'virtual void >> > dolfin::EpetraMatrix::apply(std::string)': >> > /home/buildbot/buildbots/main/fenics-src/dolfin/dolfin/la/EpetraMatrix.cpp:404: >> > error: no matching function for call to >> > 'Epetra_FECrsMatrix::GlobalAssemble(bool, Epetra_CombineMode)' >> > /home/buildbot/buildbots/main/local/include/trilinos/Epetra_FECrsMatrix.h:527: >> > note: candidates are: int Epetra_FECrsMatrix::GlobalAssemble(bool) >> > /home/buildbot/buildbots/main/local/include/trilinos/Epetra_FECrsMatrix.h:554: >> > note: int Epetra_FECrsMatrix::GlobalAssemble(const >> > Epetra_Map&, const Epetra_Map&, bool) >> > >> > Is there an older trilinos version installed on the buildbot (which >> > one and which version do we require at least?) >> > >> >> The Ubuntu Trilinos package is old (10.4). It is a modified version, >> because the 10.4 source fails to compile with gcc 4.6. >> >> There is a nasty change in the Epetra interface - the old code still >> compiled, but thanks to an interface change the code did something >> different. >> >> I would prefer to support just the latest (10.8). Is there demand for >> 10.4? I wouldn't advocate using any of the Ubuntu/Debian linear >> algebra packages (Trilinos/PETSc/BLAS) for performance. > > Supporting only 10.8 sounds fine to me. Less worries for us and those > using Trilinos will probably know how to build it.
The Debian packages will then be built without Trilinos support (unless someone package 10.8 for Debian). Johannes _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
