-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 11/17/2011 06:14 PM, Anders Logg wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 05:20:21PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 05:16:29PM +0100, Johannes Ring wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Anders Logg <l...@simula.no> >>> wrote: >>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 02:31:51PM +0000, Garth N. Wells >>>> wrote: >>>>> On 17 November 2011 13:49, Andre Massing >>>>> <mass...@simula.no> wrote: >>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >>>>>> >>>>>> On 11/17/2011 02:17 PM, Anders Logg wrote: >>>>>>> Looks like someone forgot to run the tests before >>>>>>> pushing to 1.0.x. >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Test were run. >>>>> >>>>>>> I just wanted to point this out since it wasn't me this >>>>>>> time. :-P >>>>>> >>>>>> Actually, the change in the GlobalAssemble call in >>>>>> EpetraMatrix is the culprit, it says: >>>>>> >>>>>> [ 61%] Building CXX object >>>>>> dolfin/CMakeFiles/dolfin.dir/la/EpetraFactory.cpp.o >>>>>> /home/buildbot/buildbots/main/fenics-src/dolfin/dolfin/la/EpetraMatrix.cpp: >>>>>> >>>>>> In member function 'virtual void >>>>>> dolfin::EpetraMatrix::apply(std::string)': >>>>>> /home/buildbot/buildbots/main/fenics-src/dolfin/dolfin/la/EpetraMatrix.cpp:404: >>>>>> >>>>>> error: no matching function for call to >>>>>> 'Epetra_FECrsMatrix::GlobalAssemble(bool, >>>>>> Epetra_CombineMode)' >>>>>> /home/buildbot/buildbots/main/local/include/trilinos/Epetra_FECrsMatrix.h:527: >>>>>> >>>>>> note: candidates are: int Epetra_FECrsMatrix::GlobalAssemble(bool) >>>>>> /home/buildbot/buildbots/main/local/include/trilinos/Epetra_FECrsMatrix.h:554: >>>>>> >>>>>> note: int Epetra_FECrsMatrix::GlobalAssemble(const >>>>>> Epetra_Map&, const Epetra_Map&, bool) >>>>>> >>>>>> Is there an older trilinos version installed on the >>>>>> buildbot (which one and which version do we require at >>>>>> least?) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The Ubuntu Trilinos package is old (10.4). It is a modified >>>>> version, because the 10.4 source fails to compile with gcc >>>>> 4.6. >>>>> >>>>> There is a nasty change in the Epetra interface - the old >>>>> code still compiled, but thanks to an interface change the >>>>> code did something different. >>>>> >>>>> I would prefer to support just the latest (10.8). Is there >>>>> demand for 10.4? I wouldn't advocate using any of the >>>>> Ubuntu/Debian linear algebra packages (Trilinos/PETSc/BLAS) >>>>> for performance. >>>> >>>> Supporting only 10.8 sounds fine to me. Less worries for us >>>> and those using Trilinos will probably know how to build it. >>> >>> The Debian packages will then be built without Trilinos >>> support (unless someone package 10.8 for Debian). >> >> Sounds ok to me. > > Is anyone with Trilinos / CMake skills working on getting the > buildbot green? It was not clear who is going to add this butI am looking at this right now ... - -- Andre > > -- Anders > > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: > https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : > dolfin@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : > https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : > https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOxUcPAAoJEA79ggnbq9dmnxoIAMe3op3uNHNiLLJNCuHNsekH jvmUoslK2qgJ5AC9yktoCTdy9++Bhjiw5yMpNeTjEqakJv9s6W2pGsh7u7qNlsdN chchQSt4oed7ecLLn7/CH8rm0ZLx37dPc9QfwHtHlqM3HGZFLZGeVgYUeX6Oa8QM 8bhJ2Pa5r+UJAxh7kwHj0hhImbjtz0rZGljHxEGYSxPqxiOCPcbbMiOcK68HBRun tSBZ0CvsbbbmR1nc7J/br77t05n0gV5dClo8ASTyZmrwwzgaCv20i7y4YudzPtEE TDq1yHb9KbiAhJ1fBUm4mHiBYl7yGdzWqhSY115J4lmO9h9B3Tyig6psojEIrq0= =UxA0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
