I totally agree with this idea. It is the author of a program or module that decides if his work should be distributed under a free license.
The people fixing bugs are also authors but they have to approve and respect the original license. Do we need to distinguish these two categories as author ? In the same idea, I have an old troll who remains ... Why do we use "github" to manage the sources of a free project ? Oops ... Sorry, we are only Tuesday ;) Best regards, Le 07/08/2012 09:52, Régis Houssin a écrit : > I'm not willing to put the association as a signature on the new files, > I would prefer that everyone put his name, > after all, it is the person who develops and not the association :-) -- Marc-Henri Pamiseux SARL Libricks Maison de la technopole 6, rue Léonard de Vinci - BP 0119 53001 LAVAL Cedex
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dolibarr-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev
