Le 07/08/12 13:27, Marc-Henri Pamiseux a écrit : > I totally agree with this idea. > > It is the author of a program or module that decides if his work should > be distributed under a free license. > > The people fixing bugs are also authors but they have to approve and > respect the original license. > Do we need to distinguish these two categories as author ? > > In the same idea, I have an old troll who remains ... > Why do we use "github" to manage the sources of a free project ?
and, why not ? ;-) > > Oops ... > Sorry, we are only Tuesday ;) > > Best regards, > > Le 07/08/2012 09:52, Régis Houssin a écrit : >> I'm not willing to put the association as a signature on the new files, >> I would prefer that everyone put his name, >> after all, it is the person who develops and not the association :-) > > > _______________________________________________ > Dolibarr-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev Cordialement, -- Régis Houssin --------------------------------------------------------- Cap-Networks Cidex 1130 34, route de Gigny 71240 MARNAY FRANCE VoIP: +33 1 83 62 40 03 GSM: +33 6 33 02 07 97 Web: http://www.cap-networks.com/ Email: [email protected] Dolibarr developer: [email protected] Web Portal: http://www.dolibarr.fr/ SaaS offers: http://www.dolibox.fr/ Shop: http://www.dolistore.com/ Development platform: https://doliforge.org/ ---------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Dolibarr-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev
