On Thursday 04 November 2004 12:37, Paul Libbrecht wrote: > Gee, that tastes quite ugly. > > AElfred has been under public-domain originally... and now there is be > a revision that would be under a way more restricted, namely, under GPL > !?
Hey, if YOU take a bunch of not-very-conformant and old code and rework it substantially to conform to all then-current standards, speeding it up and shrinking it considerably, then you'd get to make the choice of license on your changes too. Please stop spreading FUD by the way: the license in question has never been literally "GPL". Though now that FSF has the copyright on my updates, ClasspathX could choose that one. > How about trying the AElfred version including in the Open-Source Saxon > 6 (and maybe the open-source part of saxon >= 7). Modifications were > under Mozilla Public License which I find more comfortable to work > with... Hmm, the last time I looked at SAXON it included my version, so it couldn't legally be relicensed under MPL. - Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click _______________________________________________ dom4j-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dom4j-dev
