On Nov 5, 2004, at 1:42 AM, Chris Burdess wrote:
Scott Sanders wrote:
However, I would also say that the GNU JAXP project is in violation
of the orignal license, as the changes made are not 'clearly
documented'. Refer to the aelfred license, and the sentence stating:
"You are free to modify AElfred for your own use and
// to redistribute AElfred with your modifications, provided that the
// modifications are clearly documented."
Are there any changes? If there are, dom4j is in violation as well
as GNU JAXP. If there are no changes, then dom4j may just import the
original non-GPL sources, and there are no violations.
Viewing the cvsweb for GNU JAXP, it seems that there are some changes.
We have made significant changes to the Ælfred codebase, in order to
improve both performance and conformance to the SAX specification.
These changes are documented in the file ChangeLog.gnujaxp in the GNU
JAXP distribution. Do you feel that they should be documented
elsewhere too?
--
That would seem fine to me
Scott
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idU88&alloc_id065&op=click
_______________________________________________
dom4j-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dom4j-dev
