At the very least, if the code (as is) is useful to anyone, I don't see a problem sending it, as long as people remember I write it "hack style", so if I was going to put my name on it and put it in CVS, I'd need to whip it into something I am not ashamed of.
Jim Jim Brain, [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Researching tomorrow's decisions today." (319) 369-2070 (work) SYSTEMS ARCHITECT, INDIVIDUAL ITS, LIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA -----Original Message----- From: Robert J. Lebowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 1:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [dom4j-user] SAX vs DOM4J Jim's project idea sounds like a better way to bind Java objects to xml, and since it uses dom4j, it has to be more efficient. I've been studying JAXB, and I'm not sure I like the approach they've taken. Jim: will your work be generic enough to warrent inclusion in the dom4j package?? Rob _______________________________________________ dom4j-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dom4j-user _______________________________________________ dom4j-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dom4j-user
