On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Russell Senior <[email protected]> wrote: > FWIW, I think the youtube painted nano-capacitor thing is a hoax.
Which part? That the nano-capacitors would have such an effect, or whether the guy was actually making nano-capacitors at all? All I can think is the heat he was talking about, if real, would be from antenna length and frequency mismatch right? Wouldn't adding capacitance in any form still just be adding capacitance? If the nano-capacitors are real, what would they actually be doing? Making the antenna wire look like it has whiskers (changing the shape of the antenna)? If that's the case, it doesn't seem like it would magically allow all frequencies to be perfectly in-phase and not destructively interfere (lose power, heat). I couldn't find anyone selling nano-capacitors, or a spray of them. Either this tech works too well and it's limited to MIL, or it's bunk. Looking now on Google Scholar, using two of the guys' names (anthony sutera, rhett spencer) I found little apparently related academic articles, but did find they had patents including some for their company (two of which look antenna/nano-particle related, another more recent is biometrics for cell phones): https://www.google.com/search?tbo=p&tbm=pts&hl=en&q=inassignee:%22ChamTech+Technologies,+Incorporated%22&tbm=pts Does the fact that they now have a patent on a completely different topic indicate they might be a vaporware production house? _______________________________________________ dorkbotpdx-blabber mailing list [email protected] http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/dorkbotpdx-blabber
