On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 09:14:21AM +0200, Johannes Ring wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Would it be a good idea to store snapshots of the FEniCS packages on >> > the server for faster installation with Dorsal? The bzr cloning takes >> > forever. We could have a cronjob running on the server for pulling and >> > updating the snapshots every say 5 min. We are already pulling for the >> > buildbots. >> >> We already have that: >> >> http://fenicsproject.org/pub/software/dolfin/dolfin-snapshot.tar.gz >> http://fenicsproject.org/pub/software/ferari/ferari-snapshot.tar.gz >> http://fenicsproject.org/pub/software/ffc/ffc-snapshot.tar.gz >> http://fenicsproject.org/pub/software/fiat/fiat-snapshot.tar.gz >> http://fenicsproject.org/pub/software/instant/instant-snapshot.tar.gz >> http://fenicsproject.org/pub/software/syfi/syfi-snapshot.tar.gz >> http://fenicsproject.org/pub/software/ufc/ufc-snapshot.tar.gz >> http://fenicsproject.org/pub/software/ufl/ufl-snapshot.tar.gz > > Great. I assumed those directories were no longer alive since they > mostly have old versions. > > Should we make sure to fill up those directories with all the missing > tarballs of releases? It looks weird to have dolfin-0.9.4 and then the > snapshot. It makes a user think that snapshot is not relevant even if > the timestamp is new.
Yes, I can add the missing tarballs. > Would it be a problem to use those snapshots from Dorsal? Nothing else than whats Harish pointed out. Johannes _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dorsal Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dorsal More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
