On 25 March 2010 14:20, Chris Dennis <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello folks
>
> I wrote to Desmond Swayne, MP for New Forest West, the old-fashioned way
> with paper and ink, and got the following reply.
>
> cheers
>
> Chris
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 17 March 2010
>
> Dear Mr Swayne
>
> I am writing to you today because I am very worried that the Government
> is planning to rush the Digital Economy Bill into law without a full
> Parliamentary debate.
>
> Many people think it will damage schools and businesses as well as
> innocent people who rely on the internet because it will allow the
> Government to disconnect people it suspects of copyright infringement.
> Industry experts, internet service providers such as TalkTalk and BT and
> major internet companies like Google and Yahoo are all opposing the bill
> - yet the Government seems intent on forcing it through without a real
> debate.
>
> The freedom and openness of the internet is its strength.  It is vital
> that citizens in every country continue to have full access to it.
> What needs to change is the way that, for example, music companies such
> as Sony do business: it is up to them to adapt to the new technology,
> and find new business models that will allow them to continue.
>
> As a constituent I ask you to do all you can to ensure the Government
> does not rush the bill through and deny us our democratic right to
> scrutiny and debate.
>
> Yours sincerely
>
> Chris Dennis
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 22nd March 2010
>
> Dear Mr. Dennis,
>
> Thank you for contacting me about the Digital Economy Bill.
> For nearly twelve years, the Government has neglected this crucial area
> of our economy.  We believe a huge amount needs to be done to give the
> UK a modern regulatory environment for the digital and creative
> industries.  Whilst we welcome aspects of the bill there are other areas
> of great concern to us.
>
> We want to make sure that Britain has the most favourable intellectual
> framework in the world for innovators, digital content creators and high
> tech businesses. We recognise the need to tackle digital piracy and make
> it possible for people to buy and sell digital intellectual property
> online. However, it is vital that any anti-piracy measures promote new
> business models rather than holding innovation back. This must not be
> about propping up existing business models but creating an environment
> that allows new ones to develop. That is why we were opposed to the
> original clause 17 and are still opposed to clause 29 which props up ITV
> regional news with BBC Licence Fee payers money.
>
> The Government's failure to introduce the Bill until the eleventh hour
> of this Parliament has given rise to considerable concern that we no
> longer have the time to scrutinise the many controversial and detailed
> measures outlined in their proposals. We fully appreciate these
> concerns. However in, certain areas, including measures to allow website
> blocking in certain carefully proscribed [sic] circumstances, there has
> been substantial debate in the House of Lords. I also believe they
> should be debated in the House of Commons before we agree to them. Only
> if we are confident that they have been given the scrutiny that they
> deserve will we support them.
>
> It is also worth pointing out that many of the fears about the Bill’s
> proposals are not entirely accurate. People won’t be disconnected from
> the internet without due process. And it will only be a small minority
> of people who consistently infringe copyright who are disconnected, not
> the average person who happens to have done so once or twice. Even then,
> they may be able to reconnect using another ISP immediately and without
> penalty.
>
> Please rest assured that my colleagues in the Shadow Culture, Media and
> Sport and Shadow Business, Innovation and Skills teams will do
> everything in their power to work towards legislation that strengthens
> our digital sector and provides the security that our businesses and
> consumers so desperately need.
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> Desmond Swayne TD MP
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
Thats the exact same reply I got from Robert Syms - form letters are
wonderful things.

At least it generally seems positive regarding pushing for a proper debate.

-- 
Andrew Montgomery-Hurrell
Professional Geek
Blog: http://darkliquid.co.uk
Twitter: http://twitter.com/darkliquid
Fiction: http://www.protagonize.com/author/darkliquid
-- 
Next meeting: Bournemouth, Wed 2010-04-07 20:00
http://dorset.lug.org.uk/     http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2645413
   Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.org&channel=%23dorset
           List info: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dorset

Reply via email to