Hi Keith, > On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:55:27 +0000, ra...@inputplus.co.uk said: > > Easier, true, but I wanted more accuracy that /usr/bin/time or > > bash's time would give. :-) > > Bash's 'time' command resolves to thousandths of a second.
This is true. Guess I'm not used to it over the old-school time(1) format of centiseconds. > I would imagine that saccadic suppression would make more accurate > measurement meaningless! Thanks for the new word; dict(1) didn't know it here. :-) Cheers, Ralph. -- Next meeting: Blandford Forum, Wednesday 2011-03-02 20:00 Meets, Mailing list, IRC, LinkedIn, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ How to Report Bugs Effectively: http://goo.gl/4Xue
