Hi Stas, Bart and other DOSEMU experts, while I am not experienced with the fine details,
http://sourceforge.net/p/dosemu/code/ci/a1dff2a15698efc4f400812993ec819ea7091439/tree/COPYING.DOSEMU?diff=7a762fd24a3a53268b856874ffe15d4094ef8208 sounds as if you dropped the limitation to only version 2 of GPL, along with the explanation of why that restriction existed? Sounds ok for me. > I think enough is enough, and I am going to merge > devel branch into master and then perhaps upload > the tarballs. > People do not know about the devel branch, but it > works much better than master. I agree that people would miss quite some changes by being stuck to the non-devel branch. > The only reason I didn't merge devel before, is because > it has this commit: > https://sourceforge.net/p/dosemu/code/ci/a1dff2a15698efc4f400812993ec819ea7091439/ > which Bart called a re-licensing. I of course do not > want to do any re-licensing, but the intention of that > change is to allow contributing under "GPLv2 or later". Did any other DOSEMU experts have a strong opinion about this? Or did people not care which of the two variants should be used, except for Bart who prefers the old variant? You could ask license expert Shane. > We already have enough of such a code (all my code, > and not only that), so that clause I removed, was > invalidated long ago. There is simply no other way than > to remove it. Not sure about the context here... > So if there is no evidence this is something that should > not be done, I am going to merge things. devel right > now includes over a year of development! It can't be > allowed to rot. Sounds like a plan :-) Regards, Eric ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Dosemu-devel mailing list Dosemu-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dosemu-devel
