Go for it! Geoff Shilling
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. -----Original Message----- From: Ted Neward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Rotor on NT anyone? Just out of curiosity, though, couldn't somebody write a PAL replacement for GetCalendarInfoW to supplement the lack? If that's the only thing holding it back from NT 4.... The reason I ask is that there's a lot of schools (not colleges, but high schools and such) that won't have Win2k machines handy. If an NT4 (or, God forbid, even a WinME or Win98) PAL could be hacked up, it'd be a great thing for high school and jr. high school programming classes.... I suspect it's worth the effort, but that's just one man's opinion. Ted Neward { .NET && Java } Author, Instructor http://www.javageeks.com http://www.clrgeeks.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cristian Diaconu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 4:57 PM Subject: Re: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Rotor on NT anyone? > On Mon, 16 Sep 2002 14:40:10 -0700, John Norwood > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > >Binplace is the first tool built right after the PAL and uses the PAL > >so this is most likely a generic PAL linking problem. > > > >John > > > >This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no > >rights. > > You are right, it is a linker not a compiler issue with > GetCalendarInfoW. > > Thanks, > > Cristian >
