Actually, not much to go for, since it's already implemented in the unix branch. The issue is more one of tweaking the build to link to new files provide some of the #defines that don't exist in NT.
But I see your point ;-) Cristian On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 08:19:11 -0700, Geoff Shilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Go for it! > >Geoff Shilling > >This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no >rights. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Ted Neward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:07 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Rotor on NT anyone? > > >Just out of curiosity, though, couldn't somebody write a PAL replacement >for GetCalendarInfoW to supplement the lack? If that's the only thing >holding it back from NT 4.... The reason I ask is that there's a lot of >schools (not colleges, but high schools and such) that won't have Win2k >machines handy. If an NT4 (or, God forbid, even a WinME or Win98) PAL >could be hacked up, it'd be a great thing for high school and jr. high >school programming classes.... > >I suspect it's worth the effort, but that's just one man's opinion. > >Ted Neward >{ .NET && Java } Author, Instructor >http://www.javageeks.com >http://www.clrgeeks.com > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Cristian Diaconu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 4:57 PM >Subject: Re: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Rotor on NT anyone? > > >> On Mon, 16 Sep 2002 14:40:10 -0700, John Norwood >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >Binplace is the first tool built right after the PAL and uses the PAL > >> >so this is most likely a generic PAL linking problem. >> > >> >John >> > >> >This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no >> >rights. >> >> You are right, it is a linker not a compiler issue with >> GetCalendarInfoW. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Cristian >>
