Arild, We are looking at what standard collections would make sense to include in the product in future versions. Tied in to this decision is of course the introduction of template (generics) support. While no decisions have been made on either of these topics, we do welcome any feedback you, or anyone else has on these issues.
Regards, Kit -----Original Message----- From: Arild Fines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] newbie question: no tree class? A tree-based datastructure is not an end in itself - if you look at the C++ standard library, you wont find a std::tree class. Instead you choose a collection based on your time and space complexity requirements(although not explicitly specified as such, std::map is almost certainly implemented as a balanced tree). If you are looking for a tree to implement a dictionary, the Hashtable class will be a satisfactory alternative in most cases. That being said, the System.Collections namespace leave a few things to be desired, and a tree-based collection would be nice. > -----Original Message----- > From: dotnet discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf > Of Neville Campbell > Sent: 29. april 2002 10:05 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [DOTNET] newbie question: no tree class? > > > I expected but could not find a System.Collections.Tree class. Am I > missing something? Such a class should be supplied by the environment > rather than have a zillion programmers create their own red-black tree > classes. > > You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from > DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at > http://discuss.develop.com. You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com. You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
