I'm sorry, I haven't. I could be useful to have an N way box handy too, right? :-) /Ingo
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002 10:55:30 +0200, Willy Denoyette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Have you tried to use Allocation Profiler? You can download it from >http://www.gotdotnet.com/userarea/filedetails.aspx?FileName=AllocationPr >ofiler.zip >Using this on an 8 way box shows the same figures as running on a single CPU box. > >Willy. > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Henk de Koning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:28 PM >Subject: Re: [DOTNET] lock - how expensive is it to call? > > >> Yeah. Those sizes surprised me. I'm running on a 2 processor box, using V1, >> no service packs. Did the simple test, create a bunch of objects and print >> out the address where they're located. No boxing, so I should see the real >> sizes. >> >> Could have sworn last time I tested this, I got the same sort of results you >> did. The only difference I can see is that I'm running on a MP box now. But >> surely the number of processors shouldn't change the size of my objects ... >> Maybe the sync stuff takes more space. I'm running a strange configuration >> BTW because I have W2k Professional on a 2 processor box, meaning I don't >> get mscorsrv.dll but let mscorwks.dll handle the syncing. >> >> -- Henkk >> >> > >You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or >subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com. You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
