Also, if you are concerned about security ?! :)

Web Services
------------
Can be secured and clients authenticated using IIS mechanisms (NTLM, Basic,
Certificates etc)

Remoting
--------
Has no native support for security/authentication unless you use IIS as the
host server (which will compromise performance somewhat).

Cheers,
Stu

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Tomiczek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 May 2002 15:53
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: remoting vs. web services


This has already extensively been discussed.

In partcular it loks like this:

Web Services:
* Limited functionality (no callbacks, object referenced etc.)
* Bad performance
* Big plus: works through ttp proxies.
* Cross platform.

Remoting:
* .NET only.
* full remote object implementation with object pointers, callbacks,
events etc.
* faster due to less overhead (no soap, binary format).

Regards

Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)



-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Donnerstag, 2. Mai 2002 16:50
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [DOTNET] remoting vs. web services


Can you tell me the fundamental differences between Remoting and Web
Services? Why would you prefer to use one over the other? Is one a
sub-set of the other?

Thank you.

Bob

You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET,
or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.

You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.

You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.

Reply via email to