Ingo,

If the server platform is not .NET are you saying that Java is faster,
better, easier? I have built remoting applications that talk HTTP/SOAP with
non-.NET servers and it seems to work fine.

Kevin Burton
.NET Common Language Runtime Unleashed

-----Original Message-----
From: Ingo Rammer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [DOTNET] remoting vs. web services

Hmm ... actually I guess it's more like this ;-)

if (serverPlatform == ".NET") {
   if (clientPlatform == ".NET") {
       return "Remoting";
   } else {
       return "ASP.NET Web Services";
   }
} else {
  return "You're talking 'bout Java here?";
}

.NET Remoting and ASP.NET have the same degree of support for
firewall-configurations. Even when using HTTP, you can go for the
BinaryFormatter in Remoting which will be faster ...

just my 2c,
-Ingo

Author of "Advanced .NET Remoting"
http://www.dotnetremoting.cc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mathieu Rachlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 5:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [DOTNET] remoting vs. web services
>
>
> I think the idea is that you should use SOAP if you are
> crossing a firewall.
>
> Therefore,
>
> If Firewall Then Use WebService
> Else Use .NET Remoting
> End If
>
> I could be wrong... but that's what I'm hearing..
>
> - Mat
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wang, Yongjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:09 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [DOTNET] remoting vs. web services
>
>
> But what about the differences between remoting (with soap
> over http) and
> web services?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Tomiczek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:53 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [DOTNET] remoting vs. web services
> >
> >
> > This has already extensively been discussed.
> >
> > In partcular it loks like this:
> >
> > Web Services:
> > * Limited functionality (no callbacks, object referenced etc.)
> > * Bad performance
> > * Big plus: works through ttp proxies.
> > * Cross platform.
> >
> > Remoting:
> > * .NET only.
> > * full remote object implementation with object pointers, callbacks,
> > events etc.
> > * faster due to less overhead (no soap, binary format).
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Thomas Tomiczek
> > THONA Consulting Ltd.
> > (Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bob Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Donnerstag, 2. Mai 2002 16:50
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [DOTNET] remoting vs. web services
> >
> >
> > Can you tell me the fundamental differences between Remoting and Web
> > Services? Why would you prefer to use one over the other? Is one a
> > sub-set of the other?
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Bob
> >
> > You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe
> > from DOTNET,
> > or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at
> http://discuss.develop.com.
>
> You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe
> from DOTNET, or
> subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
>
> You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe
> from DOTNET, or
> subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
>
> You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe
> from DOTNET, or
> subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
>

You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.

You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.

Reply via email to