--- Ron Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are many benefits that you get in return for a small performance > cost.
Do you (or anyone else) have any performance data on relative costs? 1) COM+ DTC transactions 2) ADO.Net transactions 3) Stored procedure transactions > What if you wanted to build a set of objects that could compose in any > order and execute transacted code no matter which one was the root? Compose in any order? Sounds like a good way to get deadlocks. I've found this, whilst a nice sounding idea, isn't very practical. But it could just be me. ;-) > Even if you only ever used 1 database, the management you get is worth > the cost. I do believe that some of the value that COM+ had in the ASP world has gone. COM+ components made up for the limitations in ASP scripting. .Net is obviously not as limited as ASP was. This is NOT to say I don't think there is value in COM+! Merely that it is not the almost automatic choice it used to be. Peter __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
