On Fri, 17 May 2002 08:51:24 +0100, Ian Griffiths <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Having said that, there is the whole context architecture. I should warn >you that the context architecture used to be documented (in Beta 2 of the >framework) but they took out all the docs for the first release. This is >presumably because they plan to change it all. So whilst it is interesting, >although it works, it probably won't work with the next release... But this >did let you define so-called 'context attributes', which if applied to an >object which derives from ContextBoundObject would hook into the .NET >interception layer. Does this mean MSDN Mag's AOP article [1] is not forward-compatible? Can anyone confirm or deny whether the "context" infrastructure will change. If so, will the next incarnation of this stuff support the AOP concepts presented in the article to the same level? Cheers, Michael W [1] http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/02/03/AOP/AOP.asp You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
