David Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> What do you think? Absolutely. This is a common pattern. There's no reason to instantiate it, so why let someone? > Is there a special name for a class with all static members? Not that I'm aware of. Usually the static members are utility functions so I usually refer to them as utility classes. My 2¢, Drew .NET MVP You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
