Bah. Let them eat cake! Jim
> -----Original Message----- > From: Marsh, Drew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 24 May 2002 16:45 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Should constructors of all static classes be > private ? > > > Jim Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > > OTOH, why not? It's just more code to write, and you can't > > actually do anything with an instance of a pure static class, > > not even call static methods. > > Sure, there's no *real* harm in leaving it public. However, I think > completely conveying the behavioral intentions of the class is more > important than saving a couple of keystrokes. =) > > Later, > Drew > > You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe > from DOTNET, or > subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com. > You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
