Thanks for explaining that cerebrus. I thought your first post was made in jest, but I see I was mistaken.
I was at first annoyed you would find it necessary to speak directly to me as if my post was any more serious than yours, but got over it once I realized I just learned something. cheers. On Sep 24, 3:15 pm, Joe Enos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With my post, I was thinking of my company's data layer logic - the > DataReader object is passed to a private method inside the same class, > for the sole purpose of converting the result into an object. The > reader is not passed outside of the data layer to anywhere else. > > I absolutely agree with Cerebrus that it should not leave the data > layer. > > On Sep 24, 11:28 am, Cerebrus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Sundar, > > > Read my post again. And then again. > > > Guys, was my post really so ambiguous ? I don't mind anyone > > disagreeing with me but I thought it was obvious to everyone (even the > > OP, I would say) that any object can be passed as a parameter. I would > > not assume the question to be so naïve. The question is significant > > because the DataReader is not just *any* object. Rhaazy, in my > > opinion, that is not the "unnecessary" part of the question, but the > > crucial part of the question. It is what makes the question worth a > > second thought. > > > I would strongly discourage anyone passing around an active DataReader > > through various layers and applications. I would much rather extract > > the data into another data store or collection first and dispose of > > the DataReader immediately. > > > But that's just me. > > > On Sep 24, 11:05 pm, "sundar irene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > data reader is not disconnected object only dataset is disconnected object > > > On 9/24/08, Cerebrus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > "Alright" ?? No, I don't think it would be alright at all. If it were > > > > a disconnected data store, I wouldn't have any reservations, though. > > > > > On Sep 24, 2:50 pm, Benj Nunez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > Just out of curiosity: Is it alright to pass a datareader object to a > > > > > method or not?- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DotNetDevelopment, VB.NET, C# .NET, ADO.NET, ASP.NET, XML, XML Web Services,.NET Remoting" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://cm.megasolutions.net/forums/default.aspx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
