Well I'm trying give respect where it is due and trying not to be a jerk 80% of the time.
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 2:43 AM, Cerebrus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Coming from you, that's a precious compliment indeed! Thanks. :P > > On Sep 25, 11:59 pm, "dboy haha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That was pretty cool, a few intermidiate programmers like myself might > have > > missed a detail like that. Thanks for the explaination Cerebrus and that > was > > cool how Rhazzy and yourself handled that. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Cerebrus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > No problem, Rhaazy. I apologize for not being explicit enough in my > > > first post. ;-) > > > > > On Sep 25, 12:35 am, rhaazy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Thanks for explaining that cerebrus. > > > > > > I thought your first post was made in jest, but I see I was mistaken. > > > > > > I was at first annoyed you would find it necessary to speak directly > > > > to me as if my post was any more serious than yours, but got over it > > > > once I realized I just learned something. > > > > > > cheers. > > > > > > On Sep 24, 3:15 pm, Joe Enos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > With my post, I was thinking of my company's data layer logic - the > > > > > DataReader object is passed to a private method inside the same > class, > > > > > for the sole purpose of converting the result into an object. The > > > > > reader is not passed outside of the data layer to anywhere else. > > > > > > > I absolutely agree with Cerebrus that it should not leave the data > > > > > layer. > > > > > > > On Sep 24, 11:28 am, Cerebrus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Sundar, > > > > > > > > Read my post again. And then again. > > > > > > > > Guys, was my post really so ambiguous ? I don't mind anyone > > > > > > disagreeing with me but I thought it was obvious to everyone > (even > > > the > > > > > > OP, I would say) that any object can be passed as a parameter. I > > > would > > > > > > not assume the question to be so naïve. The question is > significant > > > > > > because the DataReader is not just *any* object. Rhaazy, in my > > > > > > opinion, that is not the "unnecessary" part of the question, but > the > > > > > > crucial part of the question. It is what makes the question worth > a > > > > > > second thought. > > > > > > > > I would strongly discourage anyone passing around an active > > > DataReader > > > > > > through various layers and applications. I would much rather > extract > > > > > > the data into another data store or collection first and dispose > of > > > > > > the DataReader immediately. > > > > > > > > But that's just me. > > > > > > > > On Sep 24, 11:05 pm, "sundar irene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > data reader is not disconnected object only dataset is > disconnected > > > object > > > > > > > On 9/24/08, Cerebrus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > "Alright" ?? No, I don't think it would be alright at all. > If it > > > were > > > > > > > > a disconnected data store, I wouldn't have any reservations, > > > though. > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 24, 2:50 pm, Benj Nunez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > Just out of curiosity: Is it alright to pass a datareader > > > object to a > > > > > > > > > method or not?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DotNetDevelopment, VB.NET, C# .NET, ADO.NET, ASP.NET, XML, XML Web Services,.NET Remoting" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/DotNetDevelopment You may subscribe to group Feeds using a RSS Feed Reader to stay upto date using following url <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/DotNetDevelopment";> http://feeds.feedburner.com/DotNetDevelopment</a> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
