Wouldn't it be easier to use a regular expression?
if(!Regex.IsMatch(lines,".*35=[A,1,2,4,5].*"))
wfile.WriteLines(lines);
On Dec 19, 5:59 am, "Brandon Betances" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I believe he just said no. I second the motion.
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 2:18 AM, Sreenivas
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Thanks! and in case of c language i read ,switch is implemented as if
> > else statement ,is it true??
>
> > On Dec 19, 11:51 am, Cerebrus <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Take a look at my first comment in this thread :
>
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/DotNetDevelopment/browse_thread/thread...
>
> > > My understanding of the C# switch statement is that since constants
> > > are provided as switch cases, the compiler is able to optimize the
> > > execution according to the datatype of the switch(variable). It may
> > > then implement the branching as a hashtable or a dynamic lookup.
>
> > > Even when you debug switch cases, you will observe that the control
> > > does not go to each case statement (as would happen in an "if - else
> > > if - else" construct), rather it jumps to the case statement matching
> > > the value of the variable.
>
> > > Due to these factors, the C# switch block cannot have been implemented
> > > internally as an If-else construct.
>
> > > On Dec 19, 8:59 am, Sreenivas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Sorry to the group for making incorrect statement...
> > > > Can you elaborate on this point Cerebrus...
>
> > > > On Dec 19, 12:48 am, Cerebrus <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Sorry, but that is just plain wrong.
>
> > > > > On Dec 18, 12:12 pm, Sreenivas <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > > > FYI ,Switch statement is implemented as IF-else statement
> > > > > > internally..........- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
