Wow! great....
On Dec 19, 4:14 pm, caloggins <[email protected]> wrote: > Wouldn't it be easier to use a regular expression? > > if(!Regex.IsMatch(lines,".*35=[A,1,2,4,5].*")) > wfile.WriteLines(lines); > > On Dec 19, 5:59 am, "Brandon Betances" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I believe he just said no. I second the motion. > > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 2:18 AM, Sreenivas > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > Thanks! and in case of c language i read ,switch is implemented as if > > > else statement ,is it true?? > > > > On Dec 19, 11:51 am, Cerebrus <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Take a look at my first comment in this thread : > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/DotNetDevelopment/browse_thread/thread... > > > > > My understanding of the C# switch statement is that since constants > > > > are provided as switch cases, the compiler is able to optimize the > > > > execution according to the datatype of the switch(variable). It may > > > > then implement the branching as a hashtable or a dynamic lookup. > > > > > Even when you debug switch cases, you will observe that the control > > > > does not go to each case statement (as would happen in an "if - else > > > > if - else" construct), rather it jumps to the case statement matching > > > > the value of the variable. > > > > > Due to these factors, the C# switch block cannot have been implemented > > > > internally as an If-else construct. > > > > > On Dec 19, 8:59 am, Sreenivas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Sorry to the group for making incorrect statement... > > > > > Can you elaborate on this point Cerebrus... > > > > > > On Dec 19, 12:48 am, Cerebrus <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Sorry, but that is just plain wrong. > > > > > > > On Dec 18, 12:12 pm, Sreenivas <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > FYI ,Switch statement is implemented as IF-else statement > > > > > > > internally..........- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -
