I found out that the thread window is only available in the standard version of VS, I'm using express version ... thanks anyway.
On Feb 18, 3:17 pm, Nacho108 <[email protected]> wrote: > :)) hehe, to be honest I couldn't even find this famous DEGUB menu but > I didn't want to look a beginner :)) > Thanks again! > > On Feb 18, 3:01 pm, Cerebrus <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hey, you're in the wrong menu... The DEGUB menu contains only Top > > secret, For Someone Else's Eyes Only, National security sensitive > > menuitems. You're only supposed to be looking at DEBUG -> Windows. :P > > > But seriously, > > You'll only see the menuitem when debugging, when you stop at a > > breakpoint. > > > On Feb 18, 3:43 pm, Nacho108 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I don't have the threads window in my degub/window menu. How can it > > > be? > > > > On Feb 18, 11:31 am, Cerebrus <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > You may want to look into using the Threads window (Debug -> Windows -> > > > > Threads) for this purpose. Note that it is always helpful to > > > > > identify the threads in that window, if you actually assign names to > > > > them when creating using the Name property. > > > > > On Feb 18, 1:32 pm, Nacho108 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Thanks for the ansnwer Bhargav, I've actually found a better way of > > > > > debugging multi-threading app, which is to have the output window > > > > > opened continuously, in that window I can follow all the information > > > > > related to the program and there I can see where the exception > > > > > actually happened. > > > > > Another great way I found is to use the debug class in which you can > > > > > print some information the time you need it in this same output > > > > > window. > > > > > > Maybe all these methods are already know by all users, but for me .. > > > > > I'm just starting to know them. > > > > > > On Feb 17, 8:21 pm, Bhargav Patel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > try catch must have to work im already using it in my threaded > > > > > > application. > > > > > > Plz try to print excaption.Tostring method. I thing it will suggest > > > > > > the proper line of code and thendebugthrough break point. > > > > > > > On 2/17/09, Nacho108 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > I'm starting to usethreadingin order to avoid the interface to > > > > > > > freeze whenever I'm accesing the database and for this I'm using > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > backgroundworker class, which I found very useful at least in this > > > > > > > period I'm starting. > > > > > > > The problem I'm having is that after I've started to use it , the > > > > > > > visual studio is not handling the exceptions normally anymore. > > > > > > > With > > > > > > > this I'm NOT meaning the try-catch structure inside a program, > > > > > > > but the > > > > > > > normal debugging feature of visual studio, which stops the > > > > > > > program and > > > > > > > gives back a window with the exception it arised, for example > > > > > > > some bad > > > > > > > assignament, a null reference, etc. > > > > > > > It ALWASY shows me that the exception is on the same line in the > > > > > > > program.cs: > > > > > > > > Application.Run(new Form1()); > > > > > > > > And the exception is ALWAYS the same: "Exception has been thrown > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > the target of an invocation." > > > > > > > > I was trying to read about this and it seems to be common problem > > > > > > > when > > > > > > > the exception is not in the main thread, i.e. the windows forms > > > > > > > handling thread. But in this case the exception is being made on > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > RunWorkerCompleted event handler, which belongs to the MAIN > > > > > > > thread ... > > > > > > > I'm not getting what's going on here. > > > > > > > > I want to clarify that I'm able todebugwhere the problem is using > > > > > > > another ways like flag variables, counters to see where the > > > > > > > program > > > > > > > stoped working, etc; but it would be very nice to KNOW how usually > > > > > > > peopledebugprograms withthreading. Is there a "standard" way of > > > > > > > doing this? is there a better way to do this? > > > > > > > > Thanks !- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -
