Thanks Nikhil I've already found out that in the express version there
is no such feature.

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/w15yf86f.aspx

Thanks anyway


On Feb 18, 3:28 pm, nikhil gaitonde <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Nacho,
>
> The Debug Menu displays only 3 windows unless you are running the code and
> its in debug mode.
> You can access the Thread window from Debug -> Windows -> Thread.
> You can also access it using the following shortcut Ctrl + D + T when in
> debug mode.
>
> Please check it and let me know.
>
> Regards,
> Nikhil
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Nacho108 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > :)) hehe, to be honest I couldn't even find this famous DEGUB menu but
> > I didn't want to look a beginner :))
> > Thanks again!
>
> > On Feb 18, 3:01 pm, Cerebrus <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Hey, you're in the wrong menu... The DEGUB menu contains only Top
> > > secret, For Someone Else's Eyes Only, National security sensitive
> > > menuitems. You're only supposed to be looking at DEBUG -> Windows. :P
>
> > > But seriously,
> > > You'll only see the menuitem when debugging, when you stop at a
> > > breakpoint.
>
> > > On Feb 18, 3:43 pm, Nacho108 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > I don't have the threads window in my degub/window menu. How can it
> > > > be?
>
> > > > On Feb 18, 11:31 am, Cerebrus <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > You may want to look into using the Threads window (Debug -> Windows
> > -> Threads) for this purpose. Note that it is always helpful to
>
> > > > > identify the threads in that window, if you actually assign names to
> > > > > them when creating using the Name property.
>
> > > > > On Feb 18, 1:32 pm, Nacho108 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Thanks for the ansnwer Bhargav, I've actually found a better way of
> > > > > > debugging multi-threading app, which is to have the output window
> > > > > > opened continuously, in that window I can follow all the
> > information
> > > > > > related to the program and there I can see where the exception
> > > > > > actually happened.
> > > > > > Another great way I found is to use the debug class in which you
> > can
> > > > > > print some information the time you need it in this same output
> > > > > > window.
>
> > > > > > Maybe all these methods are already know by all users, but for me
> > ..
> > > > > > I'm just starting to know them.
>
> > > > > > On Feb 17, 8:21 pm, Bhargav Patel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > try catch must have to work im already using it in my threaded
> > application.
> > > > > > > Plz try to print excaption.Tostring method. I thing it will
> > suggest
> > > > > > > the proper line of code and thendebugthrough break point.
>
> > > > > > > On 2/17/09, Nacho108 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Hi everyone,
>
> > > > > > > > I'm starting to usethreadingin order to avoid the interface to
> > > > > > > > freeze whenever I'm accesing the database and for this I'm
> > using the
> > > > > > > > backgroundworker class, which I found very useful at least in
> > this
> > > > > > > > period I'm starting.
> > > > > > > > The problem I'm having is that after I've started to use it ,
> > the
> > > > > > > > visual studio is not handling the exceptions normally anymore.
> > With
> > > > > > > > this I'm NOT meaning the try-catch structure inside a program,
> > but the
> > > > > > > > normal debugging feature of visual studio, which stops the
> > program and
> > > > > > > > gives back a window with the exception it arised, for example
> > some bad
> > > > > > > > assignament, a null reference, etc.
> > > > > > > > It ALWASY shows me that the exception is on the same line in
> > the
> > > > > > > > program.cs:
>
> > > > > > > > Application.Run(new Form1());
>
> > > > > > > > And the exception is ALWAYS the same: "Exception has been
> > thrown by
> > > > > > > > the target of an invocation."
>
> > > > > > > > I was trying to read about this and it seems to be common
> > problem when
> > > > > > > > the exception is not in the main thread, i.e. the windows forms
> > > > > > > > handling thread. But in this case the exception is being made
> > on the
> > > > > > > > RunWorkerCompleted event handler, which belongs to the MAIN
> > thread ...
> > > > > > > > I'm not getting what's going on here.
>
> > > > > > > > I want to clarify that I'm able todebugwhere the problem is
> > using
> > > > > > > > another ways like flag variables, counters to see where the
> > program
> > > > > > > > stoped working, etc; but it would be very nice to KNOW how
> > usually
> > > > > > > > peopledebugprograms withthreading. Is there a "standard" way of
> > > > > > > > doing this? is there a better way to do this?
>
> > > > > > > > Thanks !- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to