about my interests: well, I am not interested exactly in hacking as you can see it on TV, I just prefer to know which code is vulnerable and how to secure it. Many ppl use some tools like wwwhack, etc and don't even know how it works. No, if this is real hacking, I don't want to be hacker :-D. I am programmer, I work as programmer and I like my work
About symmetrical and asymmetrical ciphering: I don't know what is wrong about AES and DES, I know it is ilicit in some countries so if you don't want to have any topic about this, please tell me about 2009/6/22 Cerebrus <[email protected]> > > While moderating the messages in queue, I spent some time reviewing > your post (and all the threads in your Group). I was wondering if I > ought to ban you outright or allow this post through. The reason for > banning you would have been the references to hacking of websites, > cracking passwords as well as creation of malicious and hidden > processes, if not just the advertisement for your own Group (which > alone is usually sufficient to invite a ban or censure). > > However, my reason for not banning you is that you appear to be a > person with some potential, albeit misguided in your intentions and > you just might listen to our reason. I happen to trust my instincts > and have decided to tentatively allow you into the Group. However, > your posts will be subject to scrutiny and moderation at all times. > Please keep in mind that if at any time in the future, I feel that you > are only interesting in discussing negative activities such as > hacking, rather than programming for the sheer pleasure of it, I will > revoke your membership to this Group. > > I am not presently aware of the kind of licensing agreement you intend > to release your code with, but I hope you are aware of the legal > ramifications for you if your library is used for illegal activities. > If I were you, I would make something very useful to the average > computer user, instead of something that enables "script kiddies" to > indulge in malicious activities. > > On the technical side, I'm curious about the following: > > 1. You say your library can "encrypt with MD5, SHA1". Now, "encrypt" > is a term usually used for ciphering something that can then be de- > ciphered using a secret key. However, both of the algorithms you > mention are irreversible... i.e, they are Hash algorithms. Besides, > how is your implementation different from the .NET framework > implementation of these Hash algorithms ? > > 2. You say your library can "crack passwords". What kind of attack > does it use ? Brute force ? Brute force with optimizations ? > Dictionary ? What about the time-memory tradeoffs ? What about > performance statistics ? > > 3. Given the type of functionality you have included in your library, > it surprises me that you did not build it in C/C++. > > Looking forward to a (constructive) discussion. > > -- > Cerebrus. > Group Moderator. >
