oh, I am sorry I didn't read the whole post... well, my MD5, SHA1 classes are much easier to use... about the cracker generator: It is brute force, but not usable :) Programmer who wants to use it muset create his own class and inherit from ICrack interface, which CrackerGenerator class uses. What programmer will do with this is about his imagination...
I think good license could be LGPL. I don't think someone will use my library for malicious purposes. Script kiddies will not be able to use it and experienced ppl have better things to do (I hope). 2009/6/23 Processor Devil <[email protected]> > about my interests: > well, I am not interested exactly in hacking as you can see it on TV, I > just prefer to know which code is vulnerable and how to secure it. Many ppl > use some tools like wwwhack, etc and don't even know how it works. No, if > this is real hacking, I don't want to be hacker :-D. I am programmer, I work > as programmer and I like my work > > About symmetrical and asymmetrical ciphering: > I don't know what is wrong about AES and DES, I know it is ilicit in some > countries so if you don't want to have any topic about this, please tell me > about > > 2009/6/22 Cerebrus <[email protected]> > > >> While moderating the messages in queue, I spent some time reviewing >> your post (and all the threads in your Group). I was wondering if I >> ought to ban you outright or allow this post through. The reason for >> banning you would have been the references to hacking of websites, >> cracking passwords as well as creation of malicious and hidden >> processes, if not just the advertisement for your own Group (which >> alone is usually sufficient to invite a ban or censure). >> >> However, my reason for not banning you is that you appear to be a >> person with some potential, albeit misguided in your intentions and >> you just might listen to our reason. I happen to trust my instincts >> and have decided to tentatively allow you into the Group. However, >> your posts will be subject to scrutiny and moderation at all times. >> Please keep in mind that if at any time in the future, I feel that you >> are only interesting in discussing negative activities such as >> hacking, rather than programming for the sheer pleasure of it, I will >> revoke your membership to this Group. >> >> I am not presently aware of the kind of licensing agreement you intend >> to release your code with, but I hope you are aware of the legal >> ramifications for you if your library is used for illegal activities. >> If I were you, I would make something very useful to the average >> computer user, instead of something that enables "script kiddies" to >> indulge in malicious activities. >> >> On the technical side, I'm curious about the following: >> >> 1. You say your library can "encrypt with MD5, SHA1". Now, "encrypt" >> is a term usually used for ciphering something that can then be de- >> ciphered using a secret key. However, both of the algorithms you >> mention are irreversible... i.e, they are Hash algorithms. Besides, >> how is your implementation different from the .NET framework >> implementation of these Hash algorithms ? >> >> 2. You say your library can "crack passwords". What kind of attack >> does it use ? Brute force ? Brute force with optimizations ? >> Dictionary ? What about the time-memory tradeoffs ? What about >> performance statistics ? >> >> 3. Given the type of functionality you have included in your library, >> it surprises me that you did not build it in C/C++. >> >> Looking forward to a (constructive) discussion. >> >> -- >> Cerebrus. >> Group Moderator. >> > >
